Cases 111 - 120 of 2,324
HYLTON v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2023cv03654
Plaintiff:
KAREN HYLTON
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, BRITTANY NYAMEKYE and others
JERICA HARRELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03611
Plaintiff:
JERICA HARRELL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
T.F. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03612
Plaintiff:
TF and T.F.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Alexander Gallo v. DC
as 23-7158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alexander Gallo
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia, a municipal corporation
David Smith v. USA, et al
as 23-5268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, Metropolitan Police Department / Officer Smith Badge # 4858 and others
KLAU v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03505
Plaintiff:
RONALD KLAU
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
barclay et al v. dixon et al
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff:
leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant:
webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GREGORY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03443
Plaintiff:
MS. CHE' GREGORY and CHE' GREGORY
Defendant:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, DC GOVERNMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Religion
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
