Cases 11 - 20 of 20
SELLERS v. ROBERTS, III et al
as 5:2018cv00275
Plaintiff:
LANCE SELLERS
Defendant:
LOUIS S ROBERTS, III and ZACHARY WESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIELAT v. TATE et al
as 5:2018cv00244
Plaintiff:
JEAN BIELAT
Defendant:
JOHN TATE, Sheriff, HOLMES COUNTY, JERRY DONALD SELLERS and JOHN TATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00347
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant:
United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perales v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv22833
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
United States of America , BP, Amoco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CUNNINGHAM v. STEVENSON et al
as 3:2011cv00271
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
ERIC D STEVENSON, SELLERS SKIEVASKI & STEVENSON LLP, MATTHEW HALE BAXTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Sellers-Earnest et al
as 8:2010cv01174
Plaintiff:
Dionne Sanders
Defendant:
Sylvia Sellers-Earnest and Omayra Vanderpool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petersen v. The Florida Bar et al
as 6:2010cv00086
Plaintiff:
Robin Petersen and Robin Petersen
Defendant:
The Florida Bar, Jesse H. Diner, Maryanne Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Florida Bar et al
as 1:2008cv22603
Plaintiff:
John B. Thompson
Defendant:
Florida Bar, Supreme Court of Florida, Raoul G. Cantero and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sellers v. Dean
as 5:2008cv00173
Plaintiff:
Amy Jean Sellers and Amy Jean Sellers
Defendant:
Horace Edward Dean, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
