Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Maunsell et al v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, The et al
as 5:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
David Francis Maunsell and Dorothy J. Maunsell
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, The, Joshua B. Lobe and Lobe, Fortin & Rees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Zorn v. The State of Vermont et al
as 1:2011cv00221
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Zorn
Defendant:
The State of Vermont, The United States of America, Vermont State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy v. USA Govt. et al
as 5:2011cv00213
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
USA Govt., All States of USA, Associated Press Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gilman et al v. Town of Hardwick et al
as 5:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Gilman , R. B. , A. T. and others
Defendant:
Town of Hardwick, Unknown Police Officers 1-5, Laurent G. Bellavance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Godin v. Rutland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2009cv00150
Plaintiff:
George J. Godin
Defendant:
Rutland County Sheriff's Department, Jeffrey Stephenson and Richard B. Putnam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pietrangelo v. Alvas Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00068
Plaintiff:
James E. Pietrangelo, II
Defendant:
Alvas Corporation, George Alvanos, Christine Alvanos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brady et al v. Wing et al
as 2:2008cv00158
Plaintiff:
Edward J Brady and Rosemary B. Brady
Defendant:
Joan Loring Wing, Lisa Chalidze, Pietro J. Lynn and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Williams et al v. Anderson et al
as 1:2007cv00011
Plaintiff:
Beth Williams and Vincent Williams
Defendant:
Alice Anderson, Thomas J. Anderson, Williamson Group, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
