Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Hill v. Harvey et al
as 2:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Michael Maxwell Hill, King Michael Tutankhaman and Grand Royal Prince Michael Dompledore, III
Defendant:
Markus Harvey, Marcos Harvey, Cameron Rye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jackson v. United State Department of Justice
as 2:2022cv01117
Plaintiff:
Ricardo A Jackson
Defendant:
United State Department of Justice
Jackson v. State of Nevada
as 2:2022cv01036
Appellant:
Royale Anthony Jackson, Royal Jackson and Roy El
Appellee:
State of Nevada
Jackson v. State of Nevada
as 2:2022cv00976
Petitioner:
Donald E. Jackson
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Palmer et al v. Sisolak et al
as 3:2021cv00268
Defendant:
LVMPD Officer Joseph Lombardo, Mark Jackson, Mindy McKay and others
Plaintiff:
Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., Chad Moxley and Roger Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01823
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dutra et al
as 3:2020cv00288
Defendant:
Eric Dejesus, Chris Dutra and Jason Edmonson
Plaintiff:
Kim Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fair Maps Nevada et al v. Cegavske et al
as 3:2020cv00271
Defendant:
Registrar of Voters, Joseph P Gloria, Aubrey Rowlatt, Kathy Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Goodman, Fair Maps Nevada, Robert MacDonald and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Rev. Leonard Jackson and Nevada Resort Association PAC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sigal et al v. Bean et al
as 2:2020cv00755
Plaintiff:
Jeremy E Sigal and Stephanie L. Sibley
Defendant:
Jennifer Nash, Hubbard-Pickett, Ternes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
