Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Johnson v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Amity S Johnson
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hoffman v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Hoffman
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan Grisham, The State of New Mexico Governor, Alisha Tafoya Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lacy et al v. Balderas, Jr. et al
as 1:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
Mark Lacy and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant:
Hector H. Balderas, Jr., David R Scrase, Karen Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Soto v. Trejo et al
as 1:2022cv00740
Plaintiff:
Salvador Soto
Defendant:
Ismael Trejo, Leasa Johnson, The Board of Stewards of Ruidoso Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Lueras
as 1:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Phattboy Johnson
Defendant:
Tammy Lueras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jarrott v. Madrid et al
as 2:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Gabriella Jarrott
Defendant:
Mark Madrid and Tim Q Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 1:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Fridelyne Maisoneuve, Fabrice Thomas and others
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan Grisham, Howie Morales, Alicia J Keyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blandin v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Blandin
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, New Mexico Department of Public Safety, Marc Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daigle v. Mathew et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Claudia Daigle
Defendant:
Francis J. Mathew, Julie J Vargas, John P Hays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
