Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Sharp et al v. Board of Trustees of the State Employee's Retirement System et al
as 3:2015cv03022
Plaintiff:
David Sharp , Margaret Bonczyk and Terry Hart
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of the State Employee's Retirement System , Lori Laidlaw , Danny Silverthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DeWeese v. The Center for Prevention of Abuse et al
as 1:2013cv01576
Plaintiff:
Zachary DeWeese
Defendant:
The Center for Prevention of Abuse, Richard Stewart, Tazewell County States Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Village of Dixmoor et al
as 1:2012cv08349
Plaintiff:
Shainne Sharp
Defendant:
Village of Dixmoor, Tasso J. Kachiroubas, John Meduga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sharp v. City of Harvey et al
as 1:2012cv04974
Plaintiff:
Kwamesha Sharp
Defendant:
City of Harvey and Harvey Police Officer Jones (Star #768)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv09220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hankins v. Burton et al
as 4:2011cv04048
Plaintiff:
Aimee Hankins
Defendant:
Dennis Burton, Sharp County Arkansas Probation Office, Gene Forsyth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01827
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Davis v. Clem et al
as 2:2009cv02230
Plaintiff:
Jack E Davis
Defendant:
Harry E Clem, Richard M Joy, Joan Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
