Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Weber v. GIMH Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv07559
Defendant:
Grander Investment Management, LLC, GIMH Holdings, LLC, Grander Mortgage Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew T. Weber
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Blocher v. Rice, et al
as 1:2019cv01295
Defendant:
Dt. Kenneth Rice, Glenda Armstrong, Stephen D Blocher and others
Plaintiff:
Donald C Blocher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04754
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00498
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armstrong et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv03339
Defendant:
Jane Doe # 1-10, The City of New York, P.O. Nicholas Prisco and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Boyce and Elliot Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03321
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Boggio et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv02998
Defendant:
Police Officer Patrick Lynch, Police Officer Ryan C. Aloise, The City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
James Boggio and John Boggio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Piechowicz v. Lancaster Central School District et al
as 1:2017cv00845
Plaintiff:
Denise Piechowicz
Defendant:
Lancaster Central School District , Peter F. Kruszynski , Lancaster Board of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03742
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Armstrong v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv07469
Plaintiff:
Thomas Armstrong
Defendant:
The City of New York and Francisco Agis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
