Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Stucki et al v. City of Pocatello et al
as 4:2015cv00422
Plaintiff:
Gina Stucki , Minor Child 1 and Minor Child 2
Defendant:
City of Pocatello, Bannock County Sheriff's Office, Bannock County Emergency Communications Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VanOrden v. Bannock County et al
as 4:2014cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jason VanOrden
Defendant:
Bannock County, City of Pocatello, Loren Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennie McCormack, et al v. Stephen Herzog
as 13-35401
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JENNIE LINN MCCORMACK
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICHARD HEARN, MD, on his own behalf and on behalf of his patients
Defendant - Appellant:
STEPHEN F. HERZOG, Bannock County Prosecuting Attorney
Katsilometes v. City of Lava Hot Springs et al
as 4:2012cv00517
Plaintiff:
George W Katsilometes
Defendant:
City of Lava Hot Springs, Marshall N Burgin, Michael LeBeau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jennie McCormack v. Mark Hiedeman
as 11-36015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENNIE LINN MCCORMACK
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK L. HIEDEMAN, Bannock County Prosecuting Attorney
Jennie McCormack v. Mark Hiedeman
as 11-36010
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JENNIE LINN MCCORMACK
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK L. HIEDEMAN, Bannock County Prosecuting Attorney
Anderton v. Avery Financial Services et al
as 4:2010cv00392
Plaintiff:
Bardell J Anderton
Defendant:
Avery Financial Services, Jeff Avery, Dan Hebdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Christensen v. Bannock County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2009cv00189
Defendant:
Bannock County Sheriff's Department, Bannock County, Doug Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Christensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
