Cases 11 - 20 of 6,271
McKenzie v. Ferrantella et al
as 1:2024cv04353
Plaintiff:
Charles McKenzie
Defendant:
P.O. Ferrantella, P.O. Piskorek and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patrick v. Spradley et al
as 1:2024cv04377
Plaintiff:
Kiyan Patrick
Defendant:
Ernest Spradley, Jake Schmeisser, Ravyn Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathis v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04278
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Mathis
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, R. Collins, M. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flinn et al v. City of Evanston
as 1:2024cv04269
Plaintiff:
Margot Flinn, Carol Johnson, Stasys Neimanas and others
Defendant:
City of Evanston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Harris v. City of Naperville, Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv04196
Plaintiff:
Amara Harris
Defendant:
City of Naperville, Illinois, Juan Leon and Jonathan W Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Streeter et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04158
Plaintiff:
Jovan Streeter and Marquita Beecham
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Kenneth Sunde, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
People Of The State Of Illinois et al v. Keeler
as 1:2024cv04083
Plaintiff:
People Of The State Of Illinois and City Of Hickory Hills
Defendant:
Kevin J. Keeler
Mata v. State of Arizona
as 3:2024cv50183
Defendant:
State of Arizona and City of Chandler
Plaintiff:
Christian Mata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
