Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02986
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stone et al v. Popular Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05312
Plaintiff:
Christine Stone, David Kevin Shanyfelt, Jeanette P. Bowen and others
Defendant:
Popular Inc., Popular ABS, Inc., The Bank of New York Mellon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Cohen et al
as 1:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
Terrell Thomas
Defendant:
Howard Robert Cohen, Joseph L. Laib Jr., Joan B. Laib and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06057
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jones v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv07017
Plaintiff:
Marquis Jones
Defendant:
The City of New York, Citigroup Inc. , Citibank N.A. and others
Cross_claimant:
Citibank N.A. , Jane Doe , John Doe # 1-8 and others
Cross_defendant:
John Does # 1-8 and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Poux et al v. The County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2009cv03081
Plaintiff:
Camille Poux and Ralph Poux
Defendant:
The County of Suffolk, John White, Thomas J. Spota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
