Cases 11 - 20 of 100
The Estate of Joshua Swann v. Clay County Florida et al
as 3:2023cv00471
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Joshua Swann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIVAZ v. COOK et al
as 5:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
JARREL RIVAZ
Defendant:
JACOB COOK, RAFAEL FRANCISCO, RAYMOND MCNEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Roe v. Fryer, et al
as 3:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
Travis Roe
Defendant:
CLAY COUNTY FL, Clay County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Michelle Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. State of Florida et al
as 6:2022cv01557
Plaintiff:
Armand Cook
Defendant:
State of Florida, Wayne Shoemaker and James Feurerstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Malley et al
as 3:2022cv00823
Plaintiff:
Noah A Davis
Defendant:
Robert W Malley, Sheriff Michelle Cook and Robert W. Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Wood v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Belinda Wood
Defendant:
The State of Florida, The City of Largo, Alexa Moia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook et al v. Dixiana Association, Inc.
as 0:2022cv60081
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cook and Tanisha Rivera
Defendant:
Dixiana Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Simpson v. United States Government et al
as 6:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Ian Murray Simpson
Defendant:
United States Government, Dr. Amanda Elizabeth Gibson, Dr. Aman Sharma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
