Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv50036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. City Of Aurora et al
as 1:2020cv05731
Defendant:
Does 1-10, inclusive, A. Martin, Ethan Majerus and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Randle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Estate of Demetrius Watson v. CITY OF CHICAGO CITY OF CHICAGO et al
as 1:2020cv00027
Plaintiff:
Estate of Demetrius Watson
Defendant:
Does 1-10,, Chicago Police Department and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Miranda et al v. Chicago Police Officer Doe
as 1:2019cv00461
Plaintiff:
Maria Miranda, Martin Miranda, Sr. and L. M.
Defendant:
Chicago Police Officer Does 1-10 and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08186
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Parker Reynolds v. Elazequi et al
as 1:2018cv06340
Defendant:
S. Obaisi, R. Elazequi, Claude Owikoti and others
Plaintiff:
Annette Parker Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv03230
Defendant:
Glen Austin, John R Baldwin, Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Ann Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clements et al v. City of Elgin et al
as 1:2018cv03935
Plaintiff:
Chevelle Clements , Holly Clements and Estate of DeCynthia Clements
Defendant:
City of Elgin, Christian Jensen and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hyzy v. The State of Illinois et al
as 3:2018cv03093
Plaintiff:
Mark Hyzy
Defendant:
The State of Illinois, James T Dimas, Felicia F Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Original Bible Church of Illinois et al v. City of Markham et al
as 1:2018cv02286
Plaintiff:
Original Bible Church of Illinois and Fred Lee Fields
Defendant:
City of Markham and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
