Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Awanata v. Hertz Global Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv07888
Defendant:
Hertz Global Holdings Inc., John and Jane Does 1-999, Hertz Rental Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Oya Awanata
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradley v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2018cv50235
Defendant:
John Pixler, Sue Keiser, Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Sharrie F. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chicagoans et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 1:2018cv04242
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Eddie Johnson , Michael Tomaso and others
Plaintiff:
Chicagoans For An End To The Gang Database , Black Youth Project 100 Chicago , Blocks Together and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Sato v. Santiago et al
as 1:2017cv05399
Plaintiff:
Mark Sato
Defendant:
Beatriz Santiago, Anthony Casale, Victor Puscas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe #1 et al v Murphy et al
as 2:2016cv02393
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1 , Jane Doe #2 , Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
David Murphy, Robert Windmiller, George McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ebler et al v. Lee County et al
as 3:2016cv50167
Plaintiff:
John Ebler and Natalie Ebler
Defendant:
Lee County , City of Dixon and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Alexander et al
as 1:2016cv05155
Plaintiff:
Krystal Ellis
Defendant:
Dana Alexander, Barbara West, Robert Klich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Najee-Ullah v. Villiage of Riverdale Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv01378
Plaintiff:
Tauheedah Najee-Ullah
Defendant:
Villiage of Riverdale Police Department, Village of Riverdale, IL, David Demik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
