Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Duffy v. Kent County Delaware et al
as 1:2014cv00475
Plaintiff:
Michael Duffy
Defendant:
Kent County Delaware, Kent County DE Inc., Kent County Levy Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. Biden et al
as 1:2014cv00366
Plaintiff:
Michael Duffy
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Jr., Eric Holder, Kent County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Duffy v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv01673
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Allan Angel, Donald Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv01548
Plaintiff:
Michael Duffy
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Army Corp of Engineers, M. Mange and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alston v. Pepper et al
as 1:2013cv00483
Plaintiff:
Eshed Alston
Defendant:
William W. Pepper, Sr., Schmittinger & Rodriguez and Kent County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee-El v. Dover Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00464
Plaintiff:
Noble Khayree R. Lee-El
Defendant:
Dover Police Department, Justice of the Peace Court #7, James T Vaughn Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duffy v. Mange et al
as 1:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Michael Duffy
Defendant:
M. Mange, Kent County Delaware, B. Brooke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. Mange et al
as 1:2010cv00529
Plaintiff:
Michael Duffy
Defendant:
M. Mange, Kent County Inc. and Allan Angel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. Angel et al
as 1:2010cv00383
Plaintiff:
Michael Duffy
Defendant:
Allan Angel, Kent County Inc., M Mange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron-Honaker et al v. Arpino et al
as 1:2009cv00442
Plaintiff:
Susan Cameron-Honaker and John Cameron-Honaker & Family
Defendant:
Dee Arpino, Eleana Meyers, Meyers Crime Family and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
