Cases 11 - 20 of 45
NAZARI v. MILGRAM et al
as 1:2023cv02226
Plaintiff:
RAS LAZARUS NAZARI and BRUCE TOWNSEND
Defendant:
ANNE MILGRAM, GEORGE S. PAPADOPOULOS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FONTIL v. GARLAND
as 1:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
RAYCHEL FONTIL
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KUMAR v. ATTORNEY GENERAL USA
as 1:2023cv01314
Plaintiff:
ROHIT KUMAR
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL USA and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CASTON v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CASTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, MERRICK GARLAND and ASHLEY BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
KELLY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS KELLY
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, MERRICK GARLAND, REWARDS FOR JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MALIK v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
ATTIYA MALIK
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
