Cases 11 - 20 of 178
Acevedo v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2023cv01092
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Mark D. Wolfe and Lexi Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bess et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv03939
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Bess
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Jr Ernest J Codilis, Jason Shulman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barrera v. Murphy et al
as 1:2022cv01623
Plaintiff:
Erik Barrera
Defendant:
Erin Murphy, Jeremy O'Brien and John Haggerty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Alexander v. Trew et al
as 1:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Michael Stephen Alexander
Defendant:
Mary S Trew, Mark Joseph Lopez, The Law Offices of Van A. Schwab and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Clervrain v. McConchie et al
as 1:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain also known as Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu doing business as Brandako, Inc, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu, Manetirony Clervrain and others
Defendant:
Dan McConchie, Jim Durkin, Ronna McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whatley v. City of Chicago, et al
as 1:2021cv06056
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Whatley
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Kazmi, Westerfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
