Cases 11 - 20 of 103
CHERRY-EL v. BLOUNT et al
as 1:2023cv02233
Plaintiff:
DWANE CHERRY-EL
Defendant:
BELINDA BLOUNT, LAKISHA POOLER, MURIEL BOWSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
INKO-TARIAH v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2023cv01664
Plaintiff:
CHARLES AWUSIN INKO-TARIAH
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER and KEVIN VORNDRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BANKS et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
LOUIS A. BANKS and DB
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MUNICIPALITY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT, MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POLICE TRAINING DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IRONS v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2022cv02348
Plaintiff:
TONI IRONS
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
