Cases 11 - 20 of 40
KING v. UNITED STATES CITY OF NEW YORK
as 1:2021cv00562
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES CITY OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff:
SYLFRONIA KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKSHAW v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE et al
as 1:2020cv01900
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY POLICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. KEYBANK CAPITAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv03460
Defendant:
CORPORATE PLAZA ASSOCIATES, LLC, KEY RECREATION LENDING, POST OFFICE SQUARE FUNDING INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv03470
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, ROSIE M. CHRUSTIC, NATIONWIDE FINANCIAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CHITTENDEN COUNTY STATE ATTORNEYS OFFICE et al
as 1:2019cv03076
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, NEW YORK STATE, STACY L. GRACZYK and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CADOCHE v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et al
as 1:2018cv01699
Defendant:
THOMAS A. ADAMS, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, NORMAN ST. GEORGE and others
Plaintiff:
GALIQUOGI' DINAH DEAS CADOCHE and BRIDGETTE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'DIAH v. WESTERN UNION et al
as 1:2018cv01584
Defendant:
JOHN KOSKINEN, ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Plaintiff:
AROR ARK O'DIAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARLEY v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
as 1:2018cv01301
Plaintiff:
ALECIA Y. FARLEY
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'DIAH v. CORDRAY et al
as 1:2017cv00966
Plaintiff:
AROR ARK O'DIAH
Defendant:
RICHARD CORDRAY, CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
