Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Martinez v. National Security Technologies, LLC
as 2:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
Patricia Martinez
Defendant:
National Security Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
William Cor v. City of North Las Vegas, Nevad, et al
as 13-15468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM COR
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, NATIONAL SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES LLC, NANCY GINES, Human Resources Manager and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cor v. City of North Las Vegas, Nevada et al
as 2:2012cv00531
Defendant:
Julie Beck, City of North Las Vegas, Nevada, Nancy Gines and others
Plaintiff:
William Cor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00938
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
