Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Roemer et al v. Carochi et al
as 1:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Heather Roemer and Samantha McClellan
Defendant:
Tony Carochi, Kevin Milyard, Lou Archuleta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Morris v. Samuels et al
as 1:2014cv01296
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Morris
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, P. Laird, D. Berkebile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Garcia et al
as 1:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Valerie C Harris
Defendant:
Stephanie J Garcia, Casey Yoder, Lindsey Vigna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Welsh v. Bishop et al
as 1:2013cv01721
Plaintiff:
Jared Welsh
Defendant:
Neil Bishop, David Whetherald, Steven Chin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeAtley et al v. Keybank National Association et al
as 1:2012cv02973
Plaintiff:
Alan DeAtley , NAPI (Colorado) LLC and 15 Corporations, Inc.
Defendant:
Keybank National Association , Colorado Department of Revenue , Roxy Huber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Travis v. Murphy et al
as 1:2010cv00240
Plaintiff:
Bryan L. Travis
Defendant:
Michael Murphy, Monroe McKay, John Porifion and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rohrbough, et al v. Stone, et al
as 1:2000cv00808
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, John P. Stone, Jefferson County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Rohrbough, Susan (I) A. Petrone, Susan A. Petrone and others
Amicus Curiae:
Colorado Attorney General and National Archives and Records Administration
Interested Party:
Rocky Mountain News, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Roger Johnson and others
Special Master:
Charles Kall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
