Cases 11 - 20 of 215
EDWARDS v. LOGAN et al
as 1:2023cv02258
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
STEVEN P. LOGAN, JOHN JOSEPH TUCHI, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
NASH v. ORFINGER et al
as 1:2023cv02264
Plaintiff:
LINDA A. NASH
Defendant:
RICHARD B. ORFINGER, WENDY W. BERGER, JAMES A. EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
THOMAS v. CAPITAL CENTER, LLC
as 1:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. THOMAS
Defendant:
CAPITAL CENTER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SMITH v. US POST OFFICE
as 1:2022cv03677
Plaintiff:
GEORGE P. SMITH
Defendant:
US POST OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BARRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02823
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY P. BARRETT
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, BARACK OBAMA and others
Claimant:
NANCY PELOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02517
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
EDWARDS et al v. STATE OF ALABAMA et al
as 1:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
LUKE EDWARDS, ALABAMA - MISSISSIPPI FARM, INC. and HERITAGE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, IRA DRAYTON PRUITT, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
