Cases 11 - 20 of 20
PETTIS v. WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
as 5:2014cv00317
Plaintiff:
QUINCY L PETTIS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Levros v. Huneke et al
as 0:2012cv62258
Defendant:
Donnard Huneke, Matthew Petty, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Laura M. Levros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gozaloff v. The City of Hollywood Police Department
as 0:2012cv60138
Plaintiff:
Paul Gozaloff
Defendant:
The City of Hollywood Police Department, Joseph Siple, Alexander Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant:
United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosales v. Petty
as 6:2011cv01185
Plaintiff:
Jose F. Rosales
Defendant:
Esther J. Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Petersen v. The Florida Bar et al
as 6:2010cv00086
Plaintiff:
Robin Petersen and Robin Petersen
Defendant:
The Florida Bar, Jesse H. Diner, Maryanne Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petty v. Klokoc et al
as 8:2009cv02599
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Petty
Defendant:
Anthony Klokoc, Diana Klokoc, Nathaniel McQuay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Thompson v. Florida Bar et al
as 1:2008cv22603
Plaintiff:
John B. Thompson
Defendant:
Florida Bar, Supreme Court of Florida, Raoul G. Cantero and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sowell v. Optimal Billing Solutions et al
as 3:2008cv00580
Plaintiff:
Cora N Sowell
Defendant:
Optimal Billing Solutions, Beecker, Petty, Okeefe, and Company and Kellie Kirkland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
