Cases 11 - 20 of 21
EMRIT v. WRAY
as 1:2021cv02122
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00417
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMRIT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2020cv00379
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMRIT v. SOROS et al
as 1:2019cv00059
Defendant:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION, GEORGE SOROS and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMRIT v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv00055
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMRIT v. PAI et al
as 1:2017cv02849
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
AJIT PAI, MIGNON CLYBURN, MICHAEL O'RIELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMRIT v. HECK
as 1:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
JOE HECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMRIT v. HARDY
as 1:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
CRESENT HARDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
EMRIT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 1:2016cv02127
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, NEVADA DIVISION OF WELFARE AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES and CLARK COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
EMRIT v. SOUTHERN NEVADA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2016cv02128
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SOUTHERN NEVADA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, CLARK COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
