Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins-Dukes et al v. Zinke et al
as 5:2017cv00571
Plaintiff:
Amos A Hopkins-Dukes and Steven Geronimo Hopkins
Defendant:
Ryan Zinke, Dan Deerinwater, Terry Brunner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Church of Holistic Science, Inc. v Bilder et al
as 4:2015cv00272
Plaintiff:
Church of Holistic Science, Inc.
Defendant:
Barry D Bilder, Karen Harr and Gail Rose
Third_party_plaintiff:
Everett Lee Stone and Angela Stone
Third_party_defendant:
Ruth Bilder and Beth Mathers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Flurry v. Whetsel et al
as 5:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rose Flurry
Defendant:
John Whetsel , Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners , John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beam et al v. Whetsel et al
as 5:2013cv01018
Plaintiff:
Rose Beam and Edward Kuslak
Defendant:
John Whetsel and Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Espinosa et al v. Boydston et al
as 5:2013cv00267
Plaintiff:
Jason Espinosa and Diane Espinosa
Defendant:
Cecil Boydston, Cody Smith, Vicki Hendron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
