Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Thomas v. Sangamon County State's Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2016cv03193
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
Sangamon County State's Attorney's Office, State of Illinois, Karen Tharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamara Skube v. Travis Koester
as 15-2869
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TAMARA SKUBE
Defendant - Appellant:
TRAVIS KOESTER, In His Individual and Official Capacities at the Sangamon County Sheriff's Office
Gragg v. Springfield Police Department et al
as 3:2015cv03225
Plaintiff:
Vernon Gragg
Defendant:
Springfield Police Department, St. John's Hospital and Sangamon County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. Sangamon County Jail
as 3:2014cv03079
Plaintiff:
James F Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Sangamon County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Falyn Bruce v. Derek Guernsey, et al
as 14-1436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FALYN BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
DEREK GUERNSEY, TROY M. SWEENEY, JUSTIN HARRIS and others
Falyn Bruce v. Derek Guernsey, et al
as 14-1352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FALYN BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
DEREK GUERNSEY, TROY M. SWEENEY, JUSTIN HARRIS and others
Wyatt v. Illinois State Police Department et al
as 3:2012cv03355
Plaintiff:
Anthony Latee's Wyatt
Defendant:
Illinois State Police Department, Department of Children and Family Services, Springfield Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan et al v. Koester et al
as 3:2012cv03305
Plaintiff:
Timothy E Ryan and Brandon Hargrave
Defendant:
Travis Koester and Sangamon County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
