Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Klenda v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2011cv00112
Plaintiff:
John W Klenda
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of , Tulsa Police Department and Jay Chiarito-Mazzarella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Tulsa City-County Library System
as 4:2011cv00031
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Harris
Defendant:
Tulsa City-County Library System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
London v. Hill et al
as 4:2011cv00028
Plaintiff:
Patrick Neil London
Defendant:
Eric J Hill, David A Foust, Joseph W Beaty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2010cv00507
Plaintiff:
Larita Barnes
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of, Brandon Jay McFadden and Jeff Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haley et al v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2010cv00361
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wayne Haley, Sr , Anthony Haley , Ashlee Haley and others
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of and Tulsa Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bennett v. Johnson et al
as 4:2009cv00612
Plaintiff:
Edward Bennett
Defendant:
Lashedda Johnson, Mark Wollmershauser, Tulsa, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballard v. Espy et al
as 4:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
Joe Lamont Ballard
Defendant:
Thaddeus Espy and Tulsa, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens et al v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2009cv00453
Plaintiff:
Martinez Owens, Martinez Owens, Diana Doxey and others
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of, Tulsa, City of and D. J. Radnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Latimer, et al v. Tulsa, City of, et al
as 4:2009cv00450
Plaintiff:
Daniel Latimer, et al
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
