Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'DIAH v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2016cv00336
Plaintiff:
AROR ARK O'DIAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ZUKERMAN et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2015cv02131
Plaintiff:
ANATOL ZUKERMAN and CHARLES KRAUSE REPORTING, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ATTKISSON et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
SHARYL THOMPSON ATTKISSON , JAMES HOWARD ATTKISSON and SARAH JUDITH STARR ATTKISSON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , PATRICK R. DONAHOE , UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
GORDON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv01092
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GORDON
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , KENNETH MELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MAUNEY v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2009cv02182
Plaintiff:
FRED WOODROW MAUNEY
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JOHN E. POTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
