Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Jones v. Migoya et al
as 1:2014cv21927
Defendant:
Carlos A. Migoya, Phillip A. Villianueva, Steven Stark and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace C. Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. Freiria
as 1:2013cv20401
Plaintiff:
Wallace C. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Max Freiria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Aderson et al
as 1:2013cv20408
Plaintiff:
Wallace C. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Aderson, Mark Alfieri, Jaun Badia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Baker et al
as 1:2013cv20084
Plaintiff:
Wallace C. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Lavern Baker and E. Maria Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. The Florida Department of Children And Families - Agency et al
as 1:2012cv24503
Plaintiff:
Wallace C. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
The Florida Department of Children And Families - Agency, Anne Marie Joseph, Medgth Eugene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Thomas et al
as 1:2012cv24452
Plaintiff:
Wallace C. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin Thomas, Derrick Edwarsd and Rodney Desroches
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallace Jones, Jr. v. Lavern Baker, et al
as 12-16415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALLACE C. JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LAVERN BAKER and E. MARIA BROWN
Wallace Jones, Jr. v. Miami Dade Co. Consumer Protec
as 12-14434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALLACE C. JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MIAMI DADE CO. CONSUMER PROTECTION ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, Max Freiria - Badge #0355
Jones v. Miami Dade County Consumer Protection Enforcement Officer
as 1:2012cv22946
Plaintiff:
Wallace C. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Miami Dade County Consumer Protection Enforcement Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace Jones, Jr. v. D. Edwards, et al
as 11-15431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALLACE C. JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
D. EDWARDS, R. DESROCHES and JUDGE DEEHL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
