Cases 21 - 30 of 368
MARTIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO T MARTIN
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Griffin v. Martin County et al
as 2:2023cv14222
Plaintiff:
Theodore Keith Griffin
Defendant:
Martin County, William D. Snyder, Brandon Greis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
STATE OF FLORIDA v. MARTIN
as 4:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant:
ANTONIO T MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Florida Rights Restoration Coalition et al v. Governor of Florida et al
as 1:2023cv22688
Plaintiff:
Florida Rights Resotration Coalition, Rhoshanda Jones, Angel Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Governor of Florida, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, Florida Secretary of State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
PAWS JJBCR, LLC d/b/a The Noble Paw v. Martin County
as 2:2023cv14123
Plaintiff:
PAWS JJBCR, LLC d/b/a The Noble Paw
Defendant:
Martin County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
v. Paws JJBCR, LLC d/ba The Noble Paw et al
as 2:2023cv14124
Defendant:
Paws JJBCR, LLC d/ba The Noble Paw and Martin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PAWS JJBCR, LLC v. Martin County
as 2:2023cv14125
Plaintiff:
PAWS JJBCR, LLC a Florida Limited Liability Corporation doing business as THE NOBLE PAW and Delray Petlife, LLC
Defendant:
Martin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chew v. FCC
as 5:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Martin Richard Chew
Defendant:
FCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
