Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Stoker v. Sandy City et al
as 2:2011cv01049
Plaintiff:
K. Stoker
Defendant:
Sandy City, Tom Dolan, Douglas A. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayman v. City of Saratoga Springs et al
as 2:2011cv00969
Plaintiff:
Craig Wayman
Defendant:
City of Saratoga Springs , Bud Poduska , Brent Call and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eskelson v. Intermountain Heart Center et al
as 2:2011cv00460
Plaintiff:
Nicole R. Eskelson
Defendant:
Intermountain Heart Center and Steven Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Pennington et al v. Salt Lake County et al
as 2:2010cv00497
Plaintiff:
Garry Pennington , Judy Pennington and Tyler Pennington
Defendant:
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office, Lohra L. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Rasmussen et al
as 2:2010cv00349
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Chavez
Defendant:
Todd Rasmussen, Granite School District Police Department and Lohra Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
V.W. v. DaVinci Academy of Science and the Arts et al
as 1:2009cv00127
Plaintiff:
V.W. and V.W.
Defendant:
DaVinci Academy of Science and the Arts, DaVinci Academy of Science and the Arts, DaVinci Academy of Science and the Arts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
