Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Valentine et al v. DCFS et al
as 1:2010cv04751
Plaintiff:
Chevette A. Valentine, DeVonte Valentine Pippen and Dejanara Valentine
Defendant:
DCFS, Hull House, Maureen P. Feerick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Wilkey et al v. Sheriff's Department of Randolph County, Illinois et al
as 3:2009cv00720
Plaintiff:
David Wilkey and Marty M. Lohmeyer
Defendant:
Sheriff's Department of Randolph County, Illinois, Allen Young, Janice Barbour and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. City of East St. Louis et al
as 3:2009cv00638
Plaintiff:
Brenda Williams
Defendant:
City of East St. Louis, Michael Baxton and Keith Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberson v. Randolph et al
as 3:2008cv00284
Plaintiff:
Carlos Roberson
Defendant:
Keith Randolph and City of East St. Louis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 1:2007cv06921
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harris
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, S. G. Austin and A. R. Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. East St. Louis et al
as 3:2007cv00797
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
City of East St. Louis, James Mister, Ricky Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Burwell et al v. Tate et al
as 1:2007cv04928
Plaintiff:
Octavia Burwell, Octavia Burwell, Octavia Burwell and others
Defendant:
Michael Tate, Vince Morgan, John Knezevich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Perry et al
as 3:2007cv00482
Plaintiff:
Nicole J. Scott
Defendant:
Ricky Perry, Gilda Johnson, Officer Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
