Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Sherman v. Village of Buffalo Grove et al
as 1:2011cv06297
Defendant:
Village of Buffalo Grove , Jeffrey S Braiman , Janet Sirabian and others
Plaintiff:
Robert I Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Horton v. Sheriff et al
as 1:2011cv06064
Plaintiff:
Sherman Horton
Defendant:
Sheriff of Cook County, Cook County, Illinois and Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinex et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv03896
Plaintiff:
Frances Pinex , Sergio Pinex , Stephen Pinex and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago , David Guzman and Unknown and Unnamed Chicago Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivy v. Secretary of State et al
as 1:2011cv03256
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ivy
Defendant:
Secretary of State, Tammy Watson, Jorge Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sacco v. Broadview-Westchester Joint Water Agency et al
as 1:2011cv02511
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sacco
Defendant:
Broadview-Westchester Joint Water Agency , Sherman Jones , Sam Pulia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sherman v. Quinn et al
as 3:2010cv03086
Plaintiff:
Robert I Sherman
Defendant:
Patrick Quinn, Warren Ribley and Daniel W. Hynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kowalski v. Tierney et al
as 1:2010cv02127
Plaintiff:
Jack A Kowalski
Defendant:
John H Tierney , Sherman C Jones and Village of Broadview, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
