Cases 21 - 30 of 184
Harbor Breeze AMI, LLC et al v. City of Holmes Beach, Florida et al
as 8:2022cv01682
Plaintiff:
Harbor Breeze AMI, LLC, James Daniel Clark and Justin Daniel Clark
Defendant:
City of Holmes Beach, Florida and William L. Tokajer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. Zingale et al
as 6:2022cv01298
Plaintiff:
Angel L. Torres
Defendant:
Jim Zingale, Andrea Moreland, Lisa Vickers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BENNETT v. CLARK et al
as 5:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
SHICORA D BENNETT
Defendant:
CORRINE CLARK, REBEKAH MEHERGE, VICTORIA MAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv08320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Williams v. The City of Orlando et al
as 6:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Taquane Bernard Williams
Defendant:
State of Florida, The City of Orlando, Renee A. Roche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Clark v. Cascio et al
as 2:2021cv00811
Plaintiff:
Noel D. Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Conner Cascio, Samantha Cascio, Carmine Marceno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford v. Fluent Cannabis Dispensary et al
as 2:2021cv00644
Plaintiff:
Tyree Ford
Defendant:
Fluent Cannabis Dispensary, Brent Clark, Marksman Security Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark-Richo v. Sanmar Corporation
as 3:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
Alashai Clark-Richo
Defendant:
Sanmar Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
