Cases 21 - 30 of 33
O'Brien v. City of Champaign et al
as 2:2015cv02055
Plaintiff:
Kyle O'Brien
Defendant:
City of Champaign, Jeffrey Pickett, Jedidiah Mackey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. City of Champaign et al
as 2:2014cv02324
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
City of Champaign, Matt Rush and Montrell Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. City of Champaign Illinois et al
as 2:2014cv02200
Defendant:
City of Champaign Illinois, David Butler, Christopher C Aikman and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Neal et al
as 2:2014cv02105
Plaintiff:
Jonte Washington
Defendant:
Gabriel Neal, Jeanne McLaughin, Champaign Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Berg v. Shipley et al
as 2:2013cv02262
Plaintiff:
David L Berg
Defendant:
Chad W Shipley, Alison R Ferguson, J Metzler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saathoff et al v. City of Champaign Illinois et al
as 2:2013cv02253
Plaintiff:
Jacob Saathoff , Kathy Saathoff and Kelsey Markou
Defendant:
City of Champaign Illinois and Officer Andre Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. Iverson et al
as 2:2013cv02226
Plaintiff:
Timothy C Odom
Defendant:
Matthew Iverson, City of Champaign and Anthony Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
William Hawkins v. Rodney Mitchell, et al
as 13-2533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM K. HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY S. MITCHELL, Sued in his individual capacity, JAMES M. BOWERSOCK, Sued in his individual capacity and CITY OF CHAMPAIGN, Sued as a municipal corp.
Hawkins v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2010cv02111
Defendant:
Rodney S Mitchell, James M Bowersock and City of Champaign Illinois
Plaintiff:
William K Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
