Cases 21 - 30 of 60
DOW v. STABENOW et al
as 1:2020cv02486
Defendant:
HEADQUARTERS U.S. AIR FORCE WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, COMCAST, MOODY AIR FORCE BASE and others
Plaintiff:
SHERRY LYNN DOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VIZOCOM ICT LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00217
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
Plaintiff:
VIZOCOM ICT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ASHFORD v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv02417
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, LARRY VOLZ, DC PUBLIC LIBRARY POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURROUGHS v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2019cv01700
Defendant:
FBI, U.S. ARMY, CIA and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE MIRANDA BURROUGHS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2019cv00678
Plaintiff:
STANLEY GRAYSON BAKER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and UNITED STATES ARMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00787
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00286
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRANT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2018cv01804
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) et al
as 1:2018cv01583
Defendant:
PAUL J. MCNULTY, JAMES G. ROCHE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
