Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Orellana Castaneda v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2017cv04267
Defendant:
Matthew T. Albence, Steven Bellone, County of Suffolk and others
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Orellana Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Balde v. Basso et al
as 1:2017cv01846
Plaintiff:
Ibrahima Balde
Defendant:
Joseph Basso, Brett Bara, Christopher Rickford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Dukes v. NYCERS et al
as 1:2015cv03846
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Dukes
Defendant:
NYCERS and Board of Trustees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fortune et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01539
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Brooks, Aubrey Dukes, Mario Fortune and others
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-3, Lieutenant Vincent Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01267
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sabet v. 3M, et al
as 1:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
Sabet and Sam Arthur Sabet
Defendant:
3M, First Union Bank, ABB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Seals v. Duke and Dutches Cambridge et al
as 1:2014cv06031
Plaintiff:
Tina Seals
Defendant:
Duke and Dutches Cambridge and Fob Infant Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dukes v. New York State Psychiatric Center at Creedmor et al
as 1:2014cv01385
Defendant:
Stephen Critelli and New York State Psychiatric Center at Creedmor
Plaintiff:
Tenitia Dukes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
