Cases 21 - 30 of 66
DEMITRY v. FAUQUIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv01177
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEMITRY
Defendant:
FAUQUIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT, SNOW HILL CORPORATION, SFMC MANAGEMENT GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
HILL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2018cv00919
Plaintiff:
LARISSA HILL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00033
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAVERGNE et al v. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE, FREDERICK JOHN LAVERGNE, LEONARD P. MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PAUL RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
HILLS v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00689
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HILLS
Defendant:
JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III and AVERY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HILLS v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2017cv00690
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HILLS
Defendant:
SCOTT HARRIS and JEFF ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. WILSON SMOOT et al
as 1:2017cv00681
Plaintiff:
GEORGE V. HILL
Defendant:
J. PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT, AKIL WALKER and MARIA T. CECALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWLAND v. HILL
as 1:2016cv01601
Plaintiff:
DAVONTA MELVIN ROWLAND
Defendant:
GEORGE HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERRE v. WINN MANAGED PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00683
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS PIERRE
Defendant:
WINN MANAGED PROPERTIES, LLC, SOUTHERN HILLS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
