Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Hooker, Jr. v. Mulcahy
as 8:2015cv01062
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
Karen Lynn Mulcahy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooker et al v. Hopkins et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2015cv00750
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr. and Robert A. McDonald
Defendant:
Wallace Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooker v. Moody
as 8:2014cv01090
Plaintiff:
Carlton Hooker
Defendant:
James S. Moody, Jr. and Jeffrey S. Downing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooker v. Shinseki
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2014cv00344
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2014cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2012cv02759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant:
United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2011cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.