Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Koch et al v. Juber et al
as 5:2013cv00750
Plaintiff:
Felicia Koch , Amber Blevins , Ashley Bolding and others
Defendant:
David Juber, Jamie Baker, Gilbert Dildine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Redd v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2011cv01405
Plaintiff:
Cassady G Redd
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of , Arnold Upshaw , Jay Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Yates et al v. Independent School District I-158 of Tillman County et al
as 5:2010cv01312
Plaintiff:
Heather Yates and Robert Yates
Defendant:
Independent School District I-158 of Tillman County, Scott Winford Nelms, Stephen Nelms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Avalon Community Center, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00595
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pruitt
Defendant:
Avalon Community Center, Inc., Riverside Transitional Center, L.L.C., Donald Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Minton et al v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2009cv00221
Plaintiff:
Robert Minton, Robert Minton, Robert Minton and others
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, State of Oklahoma, Heather Christiano and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Powell et al v. Nunley et al
as 5:2008cv00753
Plaintiff:
Tim Powell and Heather Powell
Defendant:
Todd Nunley, Todd Nunley, Jimmie Bruner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Dobson Communications Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv00240
Plaintiff:
Heather Smith
Defendant:
Dobson Communications Corporation, Dobson Communications Corporation and Dobson Cellular Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
