Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Kilmer v. Torrington WY et al
as 2:2012cv00270
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kilmer
Defendant:
Torrington WY , Randy Giles , James Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Savinon v. Holmes
as 1:2012cv00195
Plaintiff:
Jules Diaz Savinon
Defendant:
Eagan James Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Endris v Arzey et al
as 2:2012cv00031
Defendant:
James Arzey, Cody Lamb and James Hill
Plaintiff:
Matthew K Endris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saccato v. Bergdahl et al
as 2:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
Fredric Saccato
Defendant:
James Bergdahl, Warren Bergdahl, Carlene Bergdahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00271
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Brecheen et al v. Teton County Hospital District et al
as 1:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Roger Brecheen , Jackson Hole OB-GYN, PC and Kathy Watkins-Brecheen
Defendant:
Teton County Hospital District, St John's Medical Center Board of Trustees, James Schuessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilcox et al v. MaGill et al
as 1:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
James Wilcox , Kelly Wilcox , Wilcox Livestock LLC and others
Defendant:
Andrew MaGill, Mark Hartman, Dan Hadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gose et al v. City of Douglas Wyoming et al
as 1:2010cv00189
Plaintiff:
Richard V Gose and Celeste M Gose
Defendant:
City of Douglas Wyoming, Dave Angielillo, Robert Chiapuzio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
