Civil Rights Cases filed in Idaho
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Tanaka v. Denning et al
as 1:2014cv00140
Plaintiff: William S. Tanaka
Defendant: Scott Denning , J.R. Gregory , Kevin Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00123
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Roseen v. Idaho State Police et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00118
Plaintiff: Darien E. Roseen
Defendant: Idaho State Police , Fruitland City Police Department , Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00450
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schruder v. Banbury et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00309
Plaintiff: Sherri L. Schruder
Defendant: Archie Banbury, Tami Rhodes, Glenna Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rounds et al v. Idaho Peace Officers Standards and Training Council
as 4:2013cv00207
Plaintiff: Trevor Scott Rounds
Defendant: Idaho Peace Officers Standards and Training Council, William L. Flink and John Does I-VII
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aldous v. Canyon County Idaho
as 1:2012cv00341
Plaintiff: Timothy Earl Aldous
Defendant: Canyon County Idaho and John Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00198
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00118
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00457
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?