Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
DISNER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01302
Plaintiff:
TODD DISNER and DWIGHT OWEN SCHWEITZER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mediator:
BRUCE A. BLITMAN and JOHN BARKETT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRIDGEFORTH et al v. VILSACK
as 1:2009cv01401
Plaintiff:
GEORGE D. BRIDGEFORTH, WILLIE BOWLING, DANIEL JACKSON and others
Defendant:
TOM VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
WESBY et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00501
Plaintiff:
THEODORE WESBY, ALISSA COLE, ANTHONY MAURICE HOOD and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, EDWIN ESPINOSA, J. NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TROXELLE v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2008cv01049
Plaintiff:
OWEN BRITTON TROXELLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and U. S. SECRETARY OF TREASURY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BENNETT et al v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2008cv00962
Plaintiff:
WILLIE E. BENNETT, JIMMIE CONYERS, KATIE CROSBY and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER, ED SCHAFER, ED SCHAFER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ROGLER v. BIGLOW et al
as 1:2007cv02308
Plaintiff:
EDAR ROGLER
Defendant:
WILLIAM BIGLOW, JULIE LU, JOHN I. GALLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
JONES et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2007cv01206
Plaintiff:
CHERYL JONES, CHERYL JONES, CALVIN C. OWENS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ADRIAN FENTY and KELLY VALENTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
