Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Clayton v. Steinagel et al
as 2:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
Jestina Clayton
Defendant:
Mark Steinagel , Lyle G. Ferguson , Julia Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morkel v. Davis et al
as 2:2010cv01176
Plaintiff:
Kirsteen Didi Morkel
Defendant:
Lynn W. Davis, Sandra Dredge, Kelly Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Posselli v. Peterson et al
as 2:2010cv00156
Defendant:
Shelly Peterson, Machell Madina, Pam Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Brett Posselli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Posselli v. Peterson et al
as 2:2010cv00154
Plaintiff:
Brett Posselli
Defendant:
Shelly Peterson, Elizabeth Peterson, Pam Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Posselli v. Jensen et al
as 2:2010cv00141
Plaintiff:
Brett Posselli
Defendant:
Dennie Jensen, Dennie Hamilton, Hillary Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roska et al v. Church et al
as 1:2009cv00130
Plaintiff:
Connie Roska, James Roska, Rusty Roska and others
Defendant:
Lisa-Michele Church, Duane Betournay, Carol Baumann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawford v. Sandy City Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00440
Plaintiff:
Brad Crawford
Defendant:
Sandy City Corporation, Chris Pingree and Brian Peterson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gedo v. Sevison et al
as 2:2008cv00438
Plaintiff:
Miguel David Gedo
Defendant:
Alan B. Sevison, Charlene Begay, Bill Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson et al v. Yeates et al
as 1:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kirt Peterson and Susie Williams
Defendant:
Lynn Yeates, Margaret Bull, Kevin Potter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson v. Yeates et al
as 1:2008cv00011
Plaintiff:
Chad Phillip Peterson
Defendant:
Lynn Yeates, Maggie Bull, Kevin Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
