Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Coutu v. Town of Cavendish et al
as 2:2011cv00244
Plaintiff:
David Coutu
Defendant:
Cavendish, the Town of, Richard F. Svec, George Timko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trombley v. Peerless Clothing International, Inc.
as 5:2011cv00205
Plaintiff:
Richard Trombley
Defendant:
Peerless Clothing International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chandler v. Carroll et al
as 2:2011cv00167
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Karen Carroll , Richard Carroll , David Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Carroll et al
as 2:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Karen Carroll , Richard Carroll and David A Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Suntag et al
as 1:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
David Suntag , Glen L. Yates , Andrew C. Boxer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doner v. Flum et al
as 2:2010cv00042
Plaintiff:
Richard Doner
Defendant:
Raymond Flum, Robert Hofmann and Andrew Pallito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Town of Bennington, Vermont et al
as 2:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
Ernist Morris
Defendant:
Town of Bennington, Vermont, Bennington Police Department, Richard Gauthier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quirion v. Lancaster
as 1:2009cv00251
Plaintiff:
Richard Quirion
Defendant:
Royce Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Godin v. Rutland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2009cv00150
Plaintiff:
George J. Godin
Defendant:
Rutland County Sheriff's Department, Jeffrey Stephenson and Richard B. Putnam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haley v. Cate et al
as 2:2008cv00245
Plaintiff:
Janet Haley and Janet Haley
Defendant:
Richard Cate, Marta Cambra and Unnamed Employees of the State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
