Cases 21 - 30 of 3,659
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05756
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ra Removal- Civil Rights (Race)
Sterling v. ACS (Administration for Children Services) et al
as 1:2024cv05936
Defendant:
ACS (Administration for Children Services), HRA (Human Resources Administration), City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05626
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Ibrahim et al v. Nassau County et al
as 2:2024cv04888
Defendant:
Jane Doe, T20 World Cup USA Inc., John Doe ##1-4 and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Ismael Ibrahim and Mohammad Tahir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Lovell v. NYC Health + Hopsital/Metroplitan et al
as 1:2024cv05281
Defendant:
NYC OHM Bureau of Forensic Services and NYC Health + Hopsital/Metroplitan
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lovell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
