Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv00640
Defendant:
Aramark, David Barker, Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2016cv00138
Defendant:
Aramark, David Barker, Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv00639
Defendant:
Aramark, David Barker, Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2016cv00125
Defendant:
Aramark, David Barker, Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tingley v. State Of California et al
as 3:2014cv00592
Defendant:
California, State Of, Lassen, County of, Palm Springs, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Wynn Tingley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Toy et al v. State of Nevada
as 2:2013cv01730
Defendant:
Ambulance Service, City of Las Vegas District Attorney's Office, City of Las Vegas Justice Court and others
Plaintiff:
Doris C. Toy and Joseph T. Toy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01666
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
