Cases 21 - 30 of 516
Lewis v. State of Illinois Domestic VIolence Division
as 1:2023cv15990
Plaintiff:
Shirley Ruth Lewis
Defendant:
State of Illinois Domestic VIolence Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Avitia v. City Of Chicago, et al
as 1:2023cv15957
Plaintiff:
Christian Avitia
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Bernard Lee Jr., Tim Tully and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Billups v. Harris et al
as 1:2023cv15093
Plaintiff:
Blake Atlas Billups
Defendant:
Daphne Harris, Paul Munoz, Cook County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Laws et al v. State of Illinois
as 1:2023cv14350
Plaintiff:
Reginald D Laws
Defendant:
State of Illinois and Attorney General Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shores v. The People of the State of Illinois
as 1:2023cv14185
Plaintiff:
Damien B Shores
Defendant:
The People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Armstrong v. The United States Federal Government et al
as 4:2023cv04139
Plaintiff:
Ryan Christopher Armstrong
Defendant:
The United States Federal Government, The State of Illinois, Kwame Raoul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Johnson v State of Illinois
as 2:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
Cedric B Johnson
Defendant:
State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
