Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01906
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Thompson et al v. Lake et al
as 3:2011cv00644
Defendant:
James Adhunko, City of Sparks, Nevada, Wesley Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Battershell and Richard Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Clark County School District
as 2:2010cv01545
702) 799-5505 (fax:
Clark County School District
Plaintiff:
Tenya Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Akers v. Rolwsek et al
as 2:2009cv00448
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Jacquelyn E. Rolwsek, James Keszei, Janine Shields and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thompson v. US Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 2:2008cv01154
Plaintiff:
Dale A Thompson
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs, James Peake, Daniel L Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Thompson v. Wells Fargo Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01227
Plaintiff:
Theodore J. Thompson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Inc., Rennisance Reality, Eric Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NOT USED
as 2:2008cv01000
Plaintiff:
Raymond Padilla
Defendant:
State of Nevada in rel. The Nevada Department of Corrections, Jim Gibbons, Kenny Guinn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
