Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Seeman v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2011cv00206
Plaintiff:
M. James Seeman
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolen v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2011cv00114
Plaintiff:
Wallace S. Nolen
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Patrick Tibbetts, Nick Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamache v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
Greg Gamache
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethea v. Plusch et al
as 1:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
Craig Bethea
Defendant:
Michael Plusch , William Wright, Bennington County, Vermont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scanlon v. State of Vermont et al
as 2:2010cv00236
Plaintiff:
John J. Scanlon, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Vermont, Jonathan Blaxe and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy v. United States Government et al
as 5:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
United States Government, New York State Government, Harrietstown Housing Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roy v. United States of America Judicial System
as 1:2009cv00241
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
United States of America Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. State of Vermont et al
as 2:2008cv00217
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
State of Vermont and Deborah L. Markowitz
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zorn v. State of Vermont, et al.
as 1:2007cv00074
Defendant:
State of Vermont, William Sorrell, James H. Douglas and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Zorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
