Cases 21 - 30 of 35,092
Mata v. State of Arizona
as 3:2024cv50183
Defendant:
State of Arizona and City of Chandler
Plaintiff:
Christian Mata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Corona et al v. North Central Narcotics Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv02306
Plaintiff:
Leticia Corona, Angel Rivera, J. H. and others
Defendant:
North Central Narcotics Task Force, Brendan F. Kelly, John Doe North Central Narcotics Task Force Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Su v. Holsten Management Corp
as 1:2024cv04037
Plaintiff:
Chong Ho Su
Defendant:
Holsten Management Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Schmalshof et al v. McDonough County, Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Evan Schmalshof and Schmalshof Family Transport LLC
Defendant:
McDonough County, Illinois and Nicholas Petitgout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kulovany v. Alcon Vision, LLC
as 1:2024cv04020
Plaintiff:
Kristen Hansen Kulovany
Defendant:
Alcon Vision, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
